Managing Organizational Change in Pakistan: Insights from the Work of Kurt Lewin.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56220/uwjms.v1i1.58Keywords:
Kurt Lewin, Organizational Change, Three-Step Model, Planned Change, Emergent ChangeAbstract
Purpose: Main objective of this paper is to review the literature on the theories of Kurt
Lewin with special focus on three-step model and discuss relevance of this model for
Pakistani organizations
Background: Kurt Lewin, a prominent social psychologist has been regarded as father of
planned change. His seminal work in planned approach to change management and
resolution of social conflicts has received considerable attention of academics and
practitioners alike.
Design/ methodology/Approach: this study used deductive approach to draw conclusions
from available literature. This study begins by searching relevant studies and extract
relevant information.
Findings: this study has found that theories of Kurt Lewin especially three-step model is
still relevant to managing organizational change in Pakistan. This study also suggests a
model which may be used by leaders as a tool to implement planned change in Pakistan.
Research limitations/implications/ recommendations: this study has not used any
empirical data therefore future research may continue to test empirical validity of Lewin’s
three-step model
References
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999).
Organizational change: A review of
theory and research in the 1990s.
Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S.
(1999). Making change permanent A
model for institutionalizing change
interventions. In Research in
organizational change and
development (pp. 97-128).
Bakari, H., Hunjra, A. I., & Niazi, G. S. K.
(2017). How does authentic leadership
influence planned organizational change? The role of employees’
perceptions: Integration of Theory of
Planned Behavior and Lewin's three
step model. Journal of Change
Management, 17(2), 155-187.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of
thought and action: A social cognitive
theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.
Bartunek, J. M., & Woodman, R. W. (2015).
Beyond Lewin: Toward a Temporal
Approximation of Organization
Development and Change. Annual
Review of Organizational Psychology
and Organizational Behavior, 2(1),
-182.
Brown, S. C. (2009). Technology acceptance and
organizational change: An integration
of theory. Auburn University, Retrieved
from http://hdl.handle.net/10415/1991
Burnes, B. (2000). Managing change: a strategic
approach to organisational dynamics.
In: Pearson Education.
Burnes, B. (2004a). Kurt Lewin and complexity
theories: back to the future? Journal of
Change Management, 4(4), 309-325.
Burnes, B. (2004b). Kurt Lewin and the Planned
Approach to Change: A Re-appraisal.
Journal of Management Studies, 41(6),
-1002.
Burnes, B. (2009). Managing change: a strategic
approach to organisational dynamics
(5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education:
Financial Times.
Burnes, B. (2014). Understanding Resistance to
Change – Building on Coch and
French. Journal of Change
Management, 15(2), 92-116.
Burnes, B. (2015). Call for Papers: Journal of
Change Management. Journal of
Change Management, 15(4), 353-355.
Burnes, B., & Bargal, D. (2017). Kurt Lewin: 70
Years on. Journal of Change
Management, 17(2), 91-100.
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G.
(2016). Unfreezing change as three
steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy
for change management. Human
relations, 69(1), 33-60.
Cummings, T. G., & Worleym, C. G. (2009).
Organization Development and
Change. Mason, USA: South-Western
Cengage Learning.
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A
processual approach. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999).
Challenging “Resistance to Change”.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral
science, 35(1), 25-41.
Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing
Successful Organizational Change in
the Public Sector. Public
Administration Review, 66(2), 168-176.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1994). Logics of
identity, contradiction, and attraction in
change. Academy of Management
Review, 19(4), 756-785.
French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1995).
Organization development: Behavioral
science interventions for organization
improvement (5th Edition ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
Giesen, E., Riddleberger, E., Christner, R., &
Bell, R. (2010). When and how to
innovate your business model. Strategy
& Leadership, 38(4), 17-26.
Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution (Vol.
. Boston, MA: Harvard Business
School Press.
Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002).
Commitment to organizational change:
Extension of a three-component model.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3),
-487.
Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2001). Strategic
Management. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin.
Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S., &
Feild, H. (2007). Toward a
Comprehensive Definition of
Readiness for Change: A Review of
Research and Instrumentation.
Research in Organizational Change
and Development, 16, 289-336.
Judson, A. S. (1991). Changing behavior in
organizations: Minimizing resistance to
change: B. Blackwell.
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B., & Jick, T. D. (1992).
The Challenge of organizational
change: How companies experience it
and leaders guide it. New York: Free
Press.
Kippenberger, T. (1998). Planned change: Kurt
Lewin's legacy. The Antidote, 3(4), 10-
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston:
Harvard Business Press.
Lawrence, P. R. (1969). How to deal with
resistance to change. Harvard Business
Review, 47(1), 166–175.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority
problems. In G. W. Lewin & G. W.
Allport (Eds.), (1948): Resolving Social
Conflict. London: Harper & Row.
Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in Group Dynamics.
In D. Cartwright (Ed.), (1952) Field
Theory in Social Science. London:
Social Science Paperbacks.
Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in Group Dynamics:
Concept, Method and Reality in Social
Science; Social Equilibria and Social
Change. Human relations, 1(1), 5-41.
Lewin, K. (1947c). Frontiers in Group Dynamics:
II. Channels of Group Life; Social
Planning and Action Research. Human
relations, 1(2), 143-153.
Lewin, K. (1958). Group decision and social
change, In EE Maccoby, TM
Newcomb, EL Hartley (eds.): Readings
in Social Psychology. In: New York:
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Luecke, R. (2003). Managing Change and
Transition (Vol. 3): Harvard Business
School Press.
Marrow, A., J. (1969). The Practical Theorist:
The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin (Vol.
. New York: Basic Books.
Naotunna, S., & Arachchige, B. (2016).
Perceived Organizational Support and
Non-managerial Employees’
Commitment to Change in Sri Lankan
Apparel Firms. South Asian Journal of
Human Resources Management, 3(1),
-57.
Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and
resistance to organizational change.
European Journal of Work and
Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-
Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (1996). Conflicting
Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualizing
Their Use in the Field of
Organizational Change. The Academy
of Management Review, 21(3), 691-
Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of
organizational decision-making.
London: Tavistock Publication
Limited.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual
analysis? Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 13(4), 337-348.
Purser, R. E., & Petranker, J. (2005). Unfreezing
the Future. The Journal of applied
behavioral science, 41(2), 182-203.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013).
Organizational-Behavior (15 ed.).
London: Pearson Education Inc.
Schein, E. H. (1996). Kurt Lewin's change theory
in the field and in the classroom: Notes
toward a model of managed learning.
Systems practice, 9(1), 27-47.
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S.
(2000). Research on the management of
innovation: The Minnesota studies:
Oxford University Press on Demand.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999).
Organizational change and
development. Annual Review of
Psychology, 50(1), 361-386.
